The question keeping me awake at night after reading these case studies was How did they do this?
Were these people just lucky, or did they do something proactive?
None of the case studies even commented on what had happened.
Every single one of them was an active participant in their cure.
Kelly A. Turner, PhD, studies people who have experienced what she calls radical remissions.
She prefers the term radical remission because she says theres nothing spontaneous about these remarkable cures.
Take Matthew, for example, who was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer at age 27.
Before the results came in, Matthew knew his tumor was gone.
The MRI confirmed that he had been cured.
Matthew spent the next two years volunteering in Brazil to help others going through their own healing process.
Here’s what Turner’s book outlines:
Turner goes into much more detail about these in the book.
Turners research is observational data, meaning that we cant prove that these factors caused the cancer remissions.
We can only observe that these patients shared these life changes in common.
But shouldnt we consider making these kinds of changes anyway?
Why wait until we get cancer?
Why not be proactive now?
Let me say again that nobody is suggesting that cancer patients shouldnt get conventional medical treatment.
But lets not stop there.
